• Help with tech

    We can help

    with e-books,

    other issues:

    Sign up at desk

  • Make a movie and win!

    First Wimberley

    Film Festival

    Entry Rules Set:

    Come Pick Up

  • Seeking tax helpers

    AARP tax aid

    helpers needed:

    Call library

  • Read to the pup

    Chopper listens:

    3:30 p.m. every

    Monday

  • Food aid

    Through November:

    Pay your fines

    With food for needy

  • Consider ...

    A year-end

    donation to

    your library.

  • Next class

    Shrimp and

    zucchini fritters:

    6 p.m. Dec. 1

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Search the Catalog

Librarian Blog

  • Different games

    My middle daughter was the great reader among our children. And it was through her that I...

  • Be still ...

    The main article on my favorite blog, called Brain Pickings, last weekend was about a book by...

This Christmas season, I plan to:
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:
Text Size

The American-Statesman is reporting today that an anti-trust trial is starting in New York against Apple, among others.

The government contends Apple conspired with publishers of e-books to set prices.

No doubt.

I don't know whether Apple was an instigator, but I do know that there's something very funny about e-book pricing, especially how high those prices are.

I've written about my dismay over the cost of an e-book in this space before, but did not know at the time about this lawsuit.

The government is right to go after the big boys in publishing and Apple, if the evidence points in that direction, because the reading public has definitely been and continues to be ripped off.

Amazon started setting prices at $9.99 for e-books. That was certainly not low, given the cost of "publishing" an e-book. But, now a lot of e-books offered by Amazon and others are priced at much higher rates than that.

There's just no justification for those prices.

That's not what the government case is about, but maybe it should be.

Add comment


Security code
Refresh