• Hands on Fun!

    Register your child for summer fun now! Read More
  • Get published!

    We're publishing

    Wimberley Voices:

    Ask us about it

  • Tech help is here

    Sign up for

    free help

    with your iPad

  • Can you spell?

    Sponsor a team

    in our Adult Bee:

    Ask us how

  • Write a review

    We will post

    it on our site.

    Ask for a form!

  • Adult reading program

    Sign up.

    Read books.

    Win prizes.

  • Learn stop-motion

    Animation

    workshop:

    all day, Aug. 1;

    sign up now

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Search the Catalog

Librarian Blog

  • Another take on Lee novel

    Adam Gopnik, one of The New Yorker's most astute and erudite writers, gives us one of the best...

  • Uh-oh

    I may have to eat my words. Those would be words that I wrote in this space last week about the...

About gay rights:
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:
Text Size

Hard to figure it out

The New York Times recently published an item under this headline: "Study Gauges Value of Technology in Schools."

Turns out the study, by the Center for American Progress, found very little value in the technologies available in schools, according to the article.

But, I am flummoxed by the piece more than I am enlightened.

One criticism, for example, is that 34 percent of eighth-graders used computers to drill basic math facts rather than doing spreadsheets or whatever else the author had in mind that eighth-graders should be doing. Programming? Designing games? Discovering algorithms?

I just don't get what the Center for American Progress would have educators do. I mean, many schools right now give elementary studnets iPads, with which one imagines they access Internet resources of all kinds beyond e-mail and Facebook.

And I am trying to square up the conclusions of the CAP with the now-widely-shared TED talk by a scientist in India who placed computers programmed in English in remote villages on that continent to see what kids would do with them. Turns out the kids learned English so they could learn everything else that was out there, and they did so without adult intervention.

Is it a waste of money if they aren't doing spreadsheets?

Add comment


Security code
Refresh