3:30 p.m. every
Sign up for
with your iPad
We will post
it on our site.
Ask for a form!
Make a movie:
Ask us how
to win a Bambi
Join us at
No. Not the end of
the world. But
the year's end.
Give a gift before
it's too late!
There is so much violent content in our movies, on television, in books, magazines and...
Why is "cool" still cool?
Frankly, I did not know that "cool" was still cool out there in the...
The New York Times recently published an item under this headline: "Study Gauges Value of Technology in Schools."
Turns out the study, by the Center for American Progress, found very little value in the technologies available in schools, according to the article.
But, I am flummoxed by the piece more than I am enlightened.
One criticism, for example, is that 34 percent of eighth-graders used computers to drill basic math facts rather than doing spreadsheets or whatever else the author had in mind that eighth-graders should be doing. Programming? Designing games? Discovering algorithms?
I just don't get what the Center for American Progress would have educators do. I mean, many schools right now give elementary studnets iPads, with which one imagines they access Internet resources of all kinds beyond e-mail and Facebook.
And I am trying to square up the conclusions of the CAP with the now-widely-shared TED talk by a scientist in India who placed computers programmed in English in remote villages on that continent to see what kids would do with them. Turns out the kids learned English so they could learn everything else that was out there, and they did so without adult intervention.
Is it a waste of money if they aren't doing spreadsheets?
E-mail (required, but will not display)
Notify me of follow-up comments