HorizontalLogoFlatKO
  • Summer reading!

    Summer reading!

    Get prizes for
    reading this
    summer!
  • Read online for free

    Read online for free

    Ask us about
    how to sign up
  • He speaks for two

    He speaks for two

    Tom Varella
    & Friends:
    10:30 July 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Search the Catalog

Librarian Blog

  • Slip slidin'

    The slippery slope's leading edge was music. That's how it all began. First, music went online...

  • Reading to a child

    One of the great pleasures of parenthood is reading to a small child, all cuddled up and cozy,...

Choose the answer that most accurately reflects your view of climate change.
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:

Is it fake or true?

Let us help you decide whether what you have just read or heard is true or fiction. Click here to find a resource page dedicated to helping you make informed decisions about what you find in the media.
Text Size
English Spanish

The American-Statesman is reporting today that an anti-trust trial is starting in New York against Apple, among others.

The government contends Apple conspired with publishers of e-books to set prices.

No doubt.

I don't know whether Apple was an instigator, but I do know that there's something very funny about e-book pricing, especially how high those prices are.

I've written about my dismay over the cost of an e-book in this space before, but did not know at the time about this lawsuit.

The government is right to go after the big boys in publishing and Apple, if the evidence points in that direction, because the reading public has definitely been and continues to be ripped off.

Amazon started setting prices at $9.99 for e-books. That was certainly not low, given the cost of "publishing" an e-book. But, now a lot of e-books offered by Amazon and others are priced at much higher rates than that.

There's just no justification for those prices.

That's not what the government case is about, but maybe it should be.

Our website is protected by DMC Firewall!