• Help with tech

    We can help

    with e-books,

    other issues:

    Sign up at desk

  • Read to the pup

    Chopper listens:

    3:30 p.m. every

    Monday

  • Get published!

    We're publishing

    Wimberley Voices:

    Ask us about it

  • Tech help is here

    Sign up for

    free help

    with your iPad

  • Can you spell?

    Sponsor a team

    in our Adult Bee:

    Ask us how

  • She's coming in April

    Fairy Godmother:

    Here at 3:30 p.m.

    on April 17!

  • Have a hero?

    Bring us a photo

    and we'll put on display

    on and after May 31.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Search the Catalog

Librarian Blog

  • Raining on Parade

    Poor Parade magazine is a mere shadow of its once proud self. I don't even look for it in my...

  • Wouldn't be happening

    If we didn't have volunteers, we'd be in deep trouble here at the library. Unlike some libraries across...

About Ukraine:
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:
Text Size

The American-Statesman is reporting today that an anti-trust trial is starting in New York against Apple, among others.

The government contends Apple conspired with publishers of e-books to set prices.

No doubt.

I don't know whether Apple was an instigator, but I do know that there's something very funny about e-book pricing, especially how high those prices are.

I've written about my dismay over the cost of an e-book in this space before, but did not know at the time about this lawsuit.

The government is right to go after the big boys in publishing and Apple, if the evidence points in that direction, because the reading public has definitely been and continues to be ripped off.

Amazon started setting prices at $9.99 for e-books. That was certainly not low, given the cost of "publishing" an e-book. But, now a lot of e-books offered by Amazon and others are priced at much higher rates than that.

There's just no justification for those prices.

That's not what the government case is about, but maybe it should be.

Add comment


Security code
Refresh