• Help with tech

    We can help

    with e-books,

    other issues:

    Noon Sept.23

  • Make a movie and win!

    First Wimberley

    Film Festival

    Entry Rules Set:

    Come Pick Up

  • Little Free Libraries now 'open'

    One at Community

    Center; another at

    Woodcreek City Hall.

  • Banned Books Week

    All week,

    Sept. 21-27

    at the Library

  • Book sale set

    8 a.m. to 3 p.m.

    Oct. 4 at

    Chapel in the Hills

  • Reading to kids

    How to read

    to kids: 1 p.m.

    Sept. 20 here

  • Seeking tax helpers

    AARP tax aid

    helpers needed:

    Call library

  • Learn about ...

    Learn about our

    online classes:

    6 p.m. Sept. 24.

    Sign-up required.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8

Search the Catalog

Librarian Blog

  • Slow it down

    Read slow, learn more and feel more relaxed. That's a formula explored in a Wall Street Journal...

  • A time to study

    We may be entering a golden era for teachers and students. Or that would be the case if I were...

What Did You Do This Summer? (Check all that apply)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:
Text Size

Hard to figure it out

The New York Times recently published an item under this headline: "Study Gauges Value of Technology in Schools."

Turns out the study, by the Center for American Progress, found very little value in the technologies available in schools, according to the article.

But, I am flummoxed by the piece more than I am enlightened.

One criticism, for example, is that 34 percent of eighth-graders used computers to drill basic math facts rather than doing spreadsheets or whatever else the author had in mind that eighth-graders should be doing. Programming? Designing games? Discovering algorithms?

I just don't get what the Center for American Progress would have educators do. I mean, many schools right now give elementary studnets iPads, with which one imagines they access Internet resources of all kinds beyond e-mail and Facebook.

And I am trying to square up the conclusions of the CAP with the now-widely-shared TED talk by a scientist in India who placed computers programmed in English in remote villages on that continent to see what kids would do with them. Turns out the kids learned English so they could learn everything else that was out there, and they did so without adult intervention.

Is it a waste of money if they aren't doing spreadsheets?

Add comment


Security code
Refresh