• Read to the pup

    Chopper listens:

    3:30 p.m. every

    Monday

  • Get published!

    We're publishing

    Wimberley Voices:

    Ask us about it

  • Tech help is here

    Sign up for

    free help

    with your iPad

  • Can you spell?

    Sponsor a team

    in our Adult Bee:

    Ask us how

  • Have a hero?

    Bring us a photo

    and we'll put on display

    on and after May 31.

  • Amnesty offered

    Your fines

    forgiven:

    May 18-23

  • Write a review

    We will post

    it on our site.

    Ask for a form!

  • Japanese gardens

    Learn from an

    expert at

    6 p.m. April 22

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8

Search the Catalog

Librarian Blog

  • Another sale

    When a book by a very popular author comes out, we buy more than one copy. Sometimes we buy as...

  • Online reviews

    Until just recently, we had a bulletin board full of short hand-written book reviews produced by...

ABOUT IRAN’S NUKES:
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:
Text Size

Hard to figure it out

The New York Times recently published an item under this headline: "Study Gauges Value of Technology in Schools."

Turns out the study, by the Center for American Progress, found very little value in the technologies available in schools, according to the article.

But, I am flummoxed by the piece more than I am enlightened.

One criticism, for example, is that 34 percent of eighth-graders used computers to drill basic math facts rather than doing spreadsheets or whatever else the author had in mind that eighth-graders should be doing. Programming? Designing games? Discovering algorithms?

I just don't get what the Center for American Progress would have educators do. I mean, many schools right now give elementary studnets iPads, with which one imagines they access Internet resources of all kinds beyond e-mail and Facebook.

And I am trying to square up the conclusions of the CAP with the now-widely-shared TED talk by a scientist in India who placed computers programmed in English in remote villages on that continent to see what kids would do with them. Turns out the kids learned English so they could learn everything else that was out there, and they did so without adult intervention.

Is it a waste of money if they aren't doing spreadsheets?

Add comment


Security code
Refresh