In this space last week I listed the most popular books checked out of the New York City public libraries in 2015.
And they are very different from the most popular here at the Wimberley library.
The No. 1 book to be checked out in 2015 here was "Girl on the Train." That book had 32 check-outs; we had multiple copies. No. 2 was "Endangered," and No. 3 was "The Assassination Option: A Clandestine Operations Novel."
Those were our top works of fiction.
On the nonfiction side of the house, the No. 1 book as "New Treehouses of the World." There was a tie for No. 2: "Bettyville: A Memoir" and "Strawdale Gardens."
The top DVD was "Wild," followed by "Birdman" and "Fury."
The New York Public Library just released the Top 10 most-checked-out books of the year, and the top one was a bit of a surprise to me.
"Leaving Time" by Jodi Piccoult ranked No. 1.
The No. 1 book was not a surprise at all: "The Girl on the Train" by Paula Hawkins. Nor was No. 3 at all startling: "Go Set a Watchman" by Harper Lee.
Rounding out the Top 5 were No. 4, "NYPD RED 3" by Marshall Karp and James Patterson; and No. 5, "Prodigal Son" by Danielle Steel.
To get a Wimberley perspective, "Leaving Time" was checked out 15 times this year by our patrons. On the other hand, "The Girl on the Train" was checked out 32 times, and "Go Set a Watchman" was checked out 33 times. Patteron's book had 20 checkouts, and Steel's had only 11.
Next time I'll write about the most popular books checked out of our library in 2015.
The rate of creation of new magazines in the United States is slowing. MediaFinder.com, a database of North American publications, found that 113 magazines were launched this year compared to nearly 200 in 2014.
Fewer closed, though. Nearly 100 shut their doors in 2014, but only 35 went out of business in 2015.
It's really hard to imagine that there is a niche market out there that doesn't have its own publication already -- and for a long, long time.
How many magazines about running or biking or hiking or travel or doll-making or baking or -- well, just name an activity -- can there possibly be?
I would certainly guess that growth is rapidly occuring in online publications, but I don't have numbers on that.
In the world of paper and print, I'm just surprised.
Although I guess I shouldn't be. After all, we get hundreds of new books on niche subjects every single year, over and over and over again. How may books do you need on running or biking or hiking or travel or doll-making or baking? There'll never be too many, apparently.
I guess I was still at The Canyon News when I first heard about college English departments having to develop what they called "bonehead English" courses because high-school grads weren't up to the task of mastering regular old freshman English.
Then I heard somewhere about the development of similar math courses for the same reason.
That must have been in the late 1970s.
Here we are 40 years later and absolutely no smarter about how to educate children.
In fact, we seem to be doing more things wrong when it comes to getting kids up to speed.
And we keep kidding ourselves by massaging various numbers that are supposed to tell us how we're doing.
Want to measure success on test scores? Fine: some teachers will just lie about the scores one way or another.
Want to measure success by graduation rates? Fine: just about everyone fix those numbers, too.
The New York Times reported yesterday that more kids are graduating than ever, but they can't do college work.
And that means they probably can't do real work in the world outside our educational institutions.
Still, we blather on about accountability, while nobody gets held accountable.
When I was growing up, I believe principals held teachers accountable, and superintendents held principals accountable, and superintendents wanted to be in the business of educating kids, not polishing their resumes for the next move up the ladder.
Maybe that's just too simple a way to look at it.
Ever since Kindles and Nooks came on the market, well-meaning children of senior adults have thought it would be cool to give those parents Kindles or Nooks for Christmas.
The result has been, for too many of the seniors, not cool at all.
Kindles and Nooks and the like seem to be more accepted by younger readers. Research bears that out. CBS News ran a story the other day on its website by Amy Kraft just on this issue. Younger people will readily adapt to electronic readers. Older folks not so much.
But, also keep in mind as you put a list together for younger readers: studies show they retain what they've read better if they read print, not pixels.
Page 34 of 103