Twenty-five kids signed up for our new "1,000 Books B4 Kindergarten" program this morning.
That's a better turnout than I expected, but I don't know how many pre-k young people are in our area. I suspect that this part of Hays County skews older than, say, the rest of Texas.
There is no deadline for participating, and this will be an ongoing program. So if you know someone with a youngster in this age group please let them know.
Years ago the state of Texas had a program that provided money to help improve residents' parenting skills.
I headed up the community committee that decided how to spend that money up in the Wichita Falls area. It was a good program, and I learned a lot of eye-opening stuff about the importance of very early childhood development. In particular I found out how children behave when they are neglected. Holding, loving, talking to and reading to a very young child is crucial for his or her brain development.
Much more research has been done on this topic in the years since I served on that panel, all of it simply underscoring the main point that young children must be stimulated in many ways so as to have a healthy brain.
Starting this Friday the library is going to give parents new tools to help them nurture the brains of their pre-k children. The program is called "1,000 Books Before Kindergarten." The kickoff is at 10:30 a.m. Friday.
This is a major initiative for us, and we are all excited about being able to help parents raise good, smart kids.
In the last blog I asked the question of whether there is a difference in comprehension for people who read on tablets as opposed to those who read printed books from the same material.
Some of the latest research indicates there is a difference and not in favor of tablet reading matter.
Benjamin Herold writes on the Digital Education Blog sponsored by Education Week about two studies presented at a national conference. Both showed significantly less comprehension among students who accessed material via tablet compared to those who read the material in printed-on-paper format.
I did find another interesting takedown of similar research by John Jones, posted in November of last year at dmlcentral.
But, from what I can tell by googling the question, tablet is not as good as print.
My newspaper career spanned 45 years and a huge change in the technologies used to write and edit news articles and features. It was my experience and observation that reporters and editors made more errors and wrote more poorly on computers than they did when using typewriters.
I concluded that there was some issue involving comprehension on the screen as opposed to on the printed page.
Nothing I have read so far persuades me to change my mind.
More and more kids, teens and adults are participating in our summer programs here at the library.
This summer, we had 240 children in the reading program, and they read 4,700 books! More than 70 people were involved in the adult program, and 30 were in the teen program.
A total of 37 area merchants provided prizes. Many thanks to them, especially.
Next summer we'll have even more, I'm sure.
We were talking this morning about the migration of reading materials from printed books to Kindles and Nooks and iPads.
Someone suggested that readers who use Kindles don't retain the material as readily as do people who use printed books.
Someone else suggested that comprehension suffers.
I just wonder.
I plan on trying to do some looking around to see if there is any good research on the subject. So, more later.
Page 9 of 44