It was only a matter of time before someone at Twitter began mining tweets for keywords to help us understand the Twitter-verse.
In today's official Twitter blog, they tell us what they learned when they looked at aggregated tweets to see when we are happy and when we are sad and when we are hungover.
Seems that we tweet most about sadness on a Sunday in December or a Monday in October. Tweets about happiness hover around a Tuesday in December and a Tuesday in January. And people tweet most often about being hungover on Sundays in March (St. Patrick's Day?) and Thursdays and Fridays in November (Thanksgiving?).
I see a lot of tweets about the miserable weather this winter. Wonder if that's a trend nationally.
New poll results just released by Verizon Digital Media Services raise some questions.
The VDMS polled millennials, people born between 1982 and 2002, a huge cohort, about their media use.
I have read the report, and I am both confused and worried.
I'm confused because there is no mention in the results about use of things like books, magazines and radio.
I wonder if these media were simply omitted from the mix by Verizon or just never mentioned by those polled. (!)
If we take the report at face value, then schools, libraries and the country as a whole are in big trouble. That's because millennials are absolutely tied at the waist to television and laptops and smart phones.
They seem to have little time for even their families.
Maybe I'm missing something here ... but ... wow.
A patron who is an avid reader of mysteries has stumbled across one of her own.
She pointed it out today as she returned a bunch of books by John Sandford books.
Turn to Page 28 in any Sanford or Baldacci, she said, doing so herself to a Sanford.
There at the top of Page 28 in the Sanford book, someone had put a check mark in black ink.
Every single mystery has that check mark.
Does the library do that?
Not that I know of.
A mystery upon a mystery.
In a given week, we probably check out several dozen CD books.
A lot of them go to people who live here but commute to Austin, I'm guessing.
Awhile back one of our volunteers was preparing to take off for a summer of travel in his motor home, and I asked him if he listened to CD books while he drove across America.
No, he said, they were too distracting, and he did not feel comfortable getting mentally lost in a book while driving such a mammoth vehicle.
At the time, I correlated that thought to the problem presented by cell-phone use while driving. Your attention is almost completely drawn to the act of communicating on a cell phone, so you don't pay attention to where you're going.
But, I'm not so sure the correlation works out because so many people do listen to CD books and don't seem to have a problem.
Perhaps there are two (maybe more) kinds of people -- those who can drive and listen to a CD book and those who can't. I do think, though, that when it comes to using a cell phone while driving there is one kind of people -- those who cannot do both at the same time successfully.
The first digital camera I looked at buying for my photojournalists was offered by the Associated Press at $25,000 per unit.
Needless to say, we just kept right on using film.
That was a long time ago in tech years.
Now, you can get a pretty darn good digital camera for a couple of hundred dollars, if not free. And it comes attached to your cell phone -- a bonus.
In today's American-Statesman it is reported that Samsung and other cell phone makers are planning to put even better cameras in their devices, perhaps approaching what you would pay hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars for in a pro-style camera.
A major question, to me, is whether this will provoke pro camera makers to lower their prices, which are astronomical by comparison.
I can understand paying a lot of money for lenses. But, for the body and software?
I'm not buying that.
Page 23 of 47