How Do I?
Frequently Asked Questions
Hours and Holidays
About the District >
Board of Trustees
Board Meeting Minutes
1,000 Books Before Kindergarten
Hands on Fun!
Saturday Morning Family Story Time
Adult Spelling Bee
About the Friends
FOWVL Board of Directors
Become a Friend
Events and Services
Fraud among scientists seems to be running rampant. Or maybe I think so must because I've been watching papers retracted, studies failing, conclusions withdrawn -- by the hundreds, literally.
It's just too tempting these days for researchers just to fudge their data. They need publications. Publications are overwhelmed. The system is falling apart.
So far, the scientists and researchers get off almost penalty free. Their colleagues seem to say, Well, there but for the grace of God go I.
It's time for we who digest their data and make important decisions to take control.
In a study by University of Albany scientists (one hpoes they did not fix their own conclusion), Americans said they want to get tough on data fraud:
"[T]he public overwhelming judges both data fraud and selective reporting as morally wrong, and supports a range of serious sanctions for these behaviors. Most notably, the vast majority of Americans support criminalizing data fraud, and many also believe the offense deserves a sentence of incarceration."
Criminalizing. Now, that's a concept!
A stat to wonder about
Here's a statistic that has an easy explanation:
The New York Times reported last Friday that since 2008, states have reduced spending on public higher education by 17 percent.
At the same time, tuition has risen 33 percent.
The number of students has not gone down by 17 percent. And parental incomes have not gone up by 33 percent.
So, there are a lot of losers and potential losers out there when the bill comes due, including citizens who have a vested interest in having other citizens who are well educated not dummies.
We may be stuck with dummies.
Join this party!
Our new Adult Coloring Book featuring Wimberley artists will go on sale at our launch party next Sunday!
The Wimberly Valley Art League and the library teamed up on this project and will co-host the party at 4 p.m. Sunday, July 17, at Bent Tree Gallery. Wine and cheese, etc., will be served, and artists will be there to sign your books.
The new book includes 36 drawings by 15 artists that you can color in to relax and to enjoy.
The books go on sale at that time. They'll be only $12 apiece, and that includes sales tax.
Or, after the 17th, drop by the library and get your copies. They will also be available at the Bent Tree Gallery, Art on 12 and at the Visitors Center.
Quite some time ago a friend and I were talking about the process of writing a novel, and he told me that to write his first published book he chose to use a pencil and legal pad. He wrote it out in long hand.
Good grief, I said, WHY?
"Just seemed like the right way to go about it," he responded.
I've been typing for so long I've almost forgotten what it's like to write something out in long hand. And when I do put pen to paper, nobody can read it, including me!
But, like everyone else in my generation, I grew up learning, first, to print, and, then, to use cursive, although my cursive was something less than lovely.
I hear from various sources these days that today's school children are not being encouraged to put pen or pencil to paper like I did. Instead, they're using keyboards or keypads or just poking at their iPad and iPhone screens.
Is something being lost in the process?
Old fogies say, Well, yes.
And -- now -- so do the experts. A recent article in The New York Times looks at all the research that's been aimed at seeing if it makes a difference whether kids learn to print and then write in cursive. Turns out, it does make a difference. Kids who learn to print and write do better in school.
That's really not counter-intuitive. If you look at what the researchers have found, you learn the process of writing is important, probably moreso than the result of the writing itself.
A question about cats
In my last blog, I wrote about a cat banned from a library up close to Dallas. Tut, tut, I say.
I personally like cats, even though I don't have one at home right now that lives inside with us. We do have an outdoor cat, who is typically aloof and fickle and finicky.
We are looking for an inside kitten, but we also have an inside dog that might not like the idea. So, we're waiting.
But, I wonder why we couldn't have a library cat?
To me, cats represent curiosity and comfort and quiet, and I associate those quallities with a library.
What about it? Would you be for or against a library cat?
About that cat
Spell it and Win
What was he thinking?
Page 4 of 86
Our website is protected by