How Do I?
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it fake or true?
About the Friends
FOWVL Board of Directors
Become a Friend
Events and Services
Hours and Holidays
About the District >
Board of Trustees
Board Meeting Minutes
1,000 Books Before Kindergarten
Tween Tech Club
Hands on Fun!
Free Reading Program
Adult Spelling Bee
Learning to be alone
In the past couple of weeks I have seen several articles in mainstream media about how people can pay more attention to what's going on around them and less attention to social media -- or their cell devices.
"Just put it up," doesn't seem to be a good answer for some reason.
Nor is, "Learn to limit your exposure."
"Grow up," surely won't work.
It's true that people seem to be constantly online, even in important business meetings. They kind of hide their phones down by their hips and glance over there as if no one could notice.
Geoffrey A. Fowler, writing about the problem in the Wall Street Journal, has a load of strategies for readers to try to keep from being complete slaves to their Facebook accounts or Twitter feeds.
I guess they all sound good.
It seems to me, though, that the issue is broader and fatter than mere addiction to information. I wonder if children are ever left alone to discover themselves. I don't mean put out on the highway and abandoned. I mean just left alone in their own rooms or out in the den without the benefit of streaming television or videos on tablets or handhelds. Do they ever have time just to stop and think?
I'm asking because I don't know. If they aren't allowed to learn to be alone with their own thoughts, though, I would say we have troubles as a society that transcend mere inattention.
Well worth it
I recently noted in this space that the return on investment for public libraries is more than $4 for every $1 spent.
That amount was determined in a study published last week by a Texas librarians group.
The ROI of the Wimberley library is significantly higher than that.
Carolyn Manning, library director, recently figured out the ROI for our library last year.
For every $1 spent, the library returned $6.53 in value.
That's a total value of $3.6 million.
And I must say that's conservative. For example, Carolyn figures that every 3D print job we produce has a value of $2. I think that's really low. Most of the objects we print are for fun, just for the heck of it, but there is still an educational value there that cannot be priced. The object itself has a certain value depending on what it is and what it is used for. But $2 seems too little.
I can't argue with other values she's assigned, but just that one variable puts us over the $6.50 mark.
And that's not including the intrinsic value our patrons get from having enjoyed a really good read or a really challenging one that made them think in a different way. Some of those experiences are simply invaluable.
For every dollar invested in a public library in Texas, communities see a return of $4.64 in "access to resources, programming, services and technology," according to a new report just issued by the Texas Library and Archives Commission.
The Bureau of Business Research at the University of Texas at Austin.
Texas libraries offer more than $1.6 billion in services, including educational programs, internet access, books and digital media and research databases.
They provide jobs for 11,000.
I think everyone agree that's a pretty good return on investiment -- almost $5 for every $1.
Very soon, we'll have a report on the Wimberley library itself. I think the numbers are even more impressive.
Last year the New York Public Library put thousands upon thousands of images into the public domain, allowing visitors to the library's website to download them.
When I first read abou this, I was excited because I like to use old images in artwork. But then I was disappointed when I actually went to what I thought as the public domain collection. What I found was a little less than wonderful, much less visually interesting.
I think I was doing it wrong.
Today on Twitter, the library notified its followers of the first anniversary of its freeing of these pictures. So, I poked around again, and this time I think I got it right.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art has just released a thousand images into the public domain, too. I have not had time to check out this collection.
I'll try to get it right the first time.
Another wrong turn
Utah's legislature is about to pass a law that makes libraries in that state block porn in their wi-fi.
At first blush, that sounds like an OK plan.
Not so when you think about it.
First: Parents have the responsibility for teaching their kids about good and bad, what to watch and not to watch, what to read and not to read, what to access and not to access. Let's not facilitate bad parental behavior.
Second: Wi-fi hookups are a dime a dozen. Kids intent on downloading porn can do so just about anywhere. Libraries are an easy target, but the wrong one. Kids in Wimberley don't come to the library to download stuff off the internet.
Third: This does nothing, but gives legislators something to crow about back home.
Fourth: This does start us down a slippery slope. After all, what is porn? A Supreme Court justice famously admitted he couldn't define pornography, but knew it when he saw it. Community standards typically set the bar. Which community? For whose wi-fi?
This country needs to stifle the impulse to censor. That path leads to the imposition of governmental rules and regulations that may not serve any purpose other than the self-aggrandizement of the powerful.
Books for the times
Great books for kids
Check it out
Page 5 of 100
is developed by
Dean Marshall Consultancy Ltd