How Do I?
Frequently Asked Questions
Hours and Holidays
About the District >
Board of Trustees
Board Meeting Minutes
1,000 Books Before Kindergarten
Hands on Fun!
Tween Tech Club
Adult Spelling Bee
About the Friends
FOWVL Board of Directors
Become a Friend
Events and Services
Back to the future?
I guess you had to be there I mean in ancient Rome That would be ancient Rome in the days of Caesar and Claudius and the gladiators That would be back when the writers of Latin did not use the full-stop period As you can tell having punctuation is a benefit That's especially true of the period
Ah, the lowly period. Period.
Turns out that particularly useful little literary device is AWOL. It's kaput. It's history. It's outthere.
That's according to a front page story in today's The New York Times by Dan Bilefsky.
Bilefsky says texting and other electronic forms of communication are killing the need for the period.
I say, Perhaps. Perhaps Not.
You may not need a period to send a quick note complete with emojis to your girlfriend about tonight's movie, but are we really going to try to read, well, front-page newspaper articles that have no periods?
Sounds like a fun story hyped to the max by a smart reporter trying to get on 1A for the purpose of building his portfolio.
The past (i.e., Latin) really isn't our future.
The library kicked off the summer youth programs with a Wacky Wednesday for the record books last week.
By the time the dust settled, which took all morning, we had counted about 350 men, women and, mainly, children right here in the main room to watch Kazoo, the whateverheis, perform and then to eat cookies, have faces painted and ride horses.
That's a record number of kickoff participants -- by far.
So, our first reaction was, Wow!
Our second reaction was, How did that happen?
Actually, we don't seem to know.
For the most part, we publicized the kickoff event just as we have in years past.
Whatever: Something clicked. Something worked. And we're just happy as clams about it.
So, come join us every Wednesday during the summer. You sure won't be alone.
Color me baffled
We're still hoping to publish an adult coloring book featuring the works of Wimberley artists this summer.
The deadline for artwork submissions is June 1. And so far we've not had a lot of entries or interest.
I'm kind of bewildered by this.
The library offered to pay for the initial press run of the coloring book. The idea was that we would recoup our money and then the profits for all sales after that would go to the Wimberley Art League.
The leadership of the art league has been enthusiastic about the project.
But Wimberley artists: Not so much so far.
Still, we have some time remaining before the deadline. I'm still hopeful.
Incidentally, the New York Times had a piece in today's paper about the burgeoning popularity of adult coloring books. About 12 million were sold last year, up from 1 million in 2014. Wow.
We had a hit
Well, our youth librarians certainly did something right in the promotion of our Wacky Wednesday kickoff event this week.
We had 350 people in the library for the morning program ... and that was with kind-of-threatening skies.
That's a good 100 more than we had last year for the same kind of program.
I don't know what was done differently this year, but we're talking about figuring it out.
Meanwhile, though, every Wednesday morning features something new and exciting at the library.
And ... we have other programs for a little bit older folks on Saturdays. Come by and check out what we're planning -- 3D printing, Lego adventures and more!
Beware the polls
Once again over the weekend we were treated to a "scientific" poll on the horse race between Clinton and Trump.
This NBC poll purported to show that the candidates were neck-and-neck.
Truly, the results showed them very close together.
But what the reporter didn't say was who exactly participated in the poll. Probable voters? All potential adult voters? People who have voted before? People who voted in primaries?
And she did not tell us what the tiny print at the top of her screen said, that the poll was considered accurate plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. Given that accuracy rate, the poll results were not accurate at all. They were so approximate that not an informed better in Vegas would bet on the results.
Polling is out of hand in this presidential race. The results are all over the place. They are not to be trusted.
Don't take my word for it. Check it out with such experts as Norman J. Ornstein and Alan I. Abramowitz, who together wrote a column on poll wackiness over the weekend in The New York Times.
News folks love horse race polling. So we will not see a rational end until the only poll that matters is taken: that's the November election.
The vanishing Statesman
Well, it does make me feel icky
Gaming the systerm
Page 9 of 89